Video story

1 of 3 | Why data protection is critical in humanitarian action

Data can save lives and humanitarian organizations are mobilizing to improve the way they collect and use it. But are they ready to handle the largely unregulated, ‘wild west’ of the global data market?

The great data gold rush

In the marketing world, data isometimes called the “new gold” because it’s a precious tool when it comes to aiming products, services or messages directly at people whose on-line behavior and personal data indicates they are a potentially receptive target.   

That goes beyond money. It can be used as a tool in law enforcement, to amass political power, or even as a weapon of war.  For millions of people around the world, data simply makes life better, linking them quickly with peopleservices, and pleasures such as art and music.  

But data can also save lives. Humanitarian organizations use it to respond more effectively to crises such as natural disaster and conflict and to track and keep people safe from fast-spreading diseases such as Cholera, Ebola and Covid-19. 

But what are the limits and pitfalls of using massive amounts of data in a global market in which there are few global standards — and no universal binding regulations — on the collection, use, storage, sale and protection of dataWhile some countries and regions have data protection laws (such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR), there’s no global dataprotection mechanism. 

Data can help local first responders adapt in real time. In Burundi, the role of some Red Cross volunteers is collecting data during emergencies. When floods hit the country in 2020, displacing thousands, volunteers could respond to people’s needs in real time as people moved into camps for the displaced, then eventually went back to their damaged homes.

High stakes

While international laws have been developed to protect people impacted by conflict or natural disaster — and symbols such as the Red Cross are used to protect humanitarian work — there are few protections safeguarding data collected to help people make it through natural disaster, conflict or other crises.  

We know how to put on the roof of a field hospital,” notes Nathaniel Raymond, a lecturer and human rights expert at Yale University’s Jackson Institute for Global Affairs. “But how do you put a Red Cross or a Red Crescent on a server? How do we put a Red Cross or a Red Crescent on a database or a thumb drive? 

“So far, we have not figured out how to distinguish and protect data of a humanitarian character and that means the risk of that data becoming commodified, weaponized or exploited is very high. 

Armed groups or governments, for example, could obtain such data to track people it considers enemies. Or human traffickers might use the data to identify vulnerable targets. Meanwhile, the phone networks, banks and social media platforms that aid groups use to provide services, have their own agendas.  

“Many of the companies that provide these platforms and services have data-driven and data-intensive business models,” says Alexandrine Pirlot de Corbion, director of strategy at Privacy International, a leading global data privacy organization.  

“They depend on the vast processing of data to thrive. Often these companies have little concern for human rights or any consideration for how different users might be affected by the products they provide.”    

At the same time, humanitarians are being hit with increasing demands — long-term conflicts, increasingly frequent storms and outbreaks — just as their budgets are being constrained and international donors are pushing aid groups to be more efficient.   

There is this increased pressure from funders to embrace innovation and to make use of technology, putting pressure to be more accountable and transparent with scarce resources,” says Pirlot de Corbionwho also helped author a joint publication produced by Privacy International and the ICRC called The humanitarian Metadata problem: Doing no harm in the digital era 

“The other reality is that conflicts are lasting longer, natural disasters are happening more frequently, so there is a sustained pressure on aid groups to continuously do more with less.  

While laws and emblems are used to protect humanitarian workers doing dangerous tasks in the physical world, there are few similar protections for sensitive data used in humanitarian work. “We know how to put a Red Cross or a Red Crescent on a field hospital, but how do we put a Red Cross on a server, or a thumb drive,” notes humanitarian data expert Nathaniel Raymond.

One data-driven innovation now widely embraced by humanitarian organizations is the use of e-banking systems to deliver cash directly to people impacted by crisisThe practice has many advantages: aside from reducing the costs and problems associated with importing massive amounts of food or goods to a crisis zone, cash allows people to support local markets and producers while making their own choices about their most dire needs.   

In conflict zones, it can also be safer. “The provision of cash limits people’s visibility and exposure because it doesn’t require people to gather in the same spot for a food distribution, where they could be vulnerable,” says Massimo Marelli, head of the Data Protection Office at the ICRC. 

There is a risk, though, that data about the electronic cash transfers could still be misused. While banks use encryption systems to protect the content of cash transactions, there is data associated with each transfer that helps the money get where it needs to go. This is called “metadata” and it functions a bit like the address on a package. What’s inside the package is shielded, but the metadata around it, could reveals a lot about who sent it, from where it was sent, who is receiving it, when it was sent, etc. 

If the information was obtained by a party to the conflict, it could make people even more vulnerable to abuse or attack, notes Marelli. “At what time are people withdrawing cash? Where do they withdraw cash from? Where do they spend it? What do they spend it on? All this is very valuable information, which could be used to profile an individual and potentially indicate that someone might be more likely to be an enemy to one of the parties in a conflict.  

Similarly, many encrypted messaging systems also rely on metadata to get SMS texts where they need to go. This is a serious concern as many humanitarian organizations use text messaging systems to share and receive important health, safety and other information with vulnerable groups such as migrants, refugees and people displaced by violence or disaster 

Experts quoted in this story say these concerns should not cause humanitarians to run from technology. But they argue that the sector as a whole needs to better understand the risks  involvedso they know what innovations to avoid—and what steps to take to protect people and their data when they do embrace new technology.  For this reason, the ICRC published a Handbook on data protection in humanitarian action to help staff, as well as members of other organizations, navigate these difficult issues.   

Clearly, there is a lot at stake. If people see their data is being misused, humanitarians could lose their most precious asset: the trust of those they hope to help.  

If the people do not trust you, if they don’t trust that the data will only be used for humanitarian purposes, they may stop coming to you,” says Marelli. “And that will mean that they will not have access to essential humanitarian services. They will not have access to health care, sanitation, nutrition…and that effects are huge for everybody. 

Data about community attitudes and behaviours was critical to the ultimate eradication of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 2020. Here, a volunteer for the Red Cross looks over data collected from community members that, when added with similar surveys, helped the Red Cross respond to community concerns about the health measures needed to stop the disease’s spread.


What happens when machines can decide who to kill?

It’s the stuff of science fiction: machines that make decisions about who and when to kill. Referred to as “autonomous weapons”, they’re already in use to some degree. But as more sophisticated systems are being developed we wanted to an expert in the field about whether such systems comply with international humanitarian law and what it means for humanity to give machines the power over human life and death.

‘Wildfire diaries’ and radical change in communications

In this episode, we talk with humanitarian communicator Kathy Mueller who produced our first magazine podcast series, The Wildfire Diaries, about massive wildfires in Northern Canada in 2017. We talk about that series, her many international missions, and the big changes in humanitarian communications since she began with the Canadian Red Cross almost 20 years ago.

The power of storytelling

In this episode, we talk about the power of storytelling to inform and inspire. “Storytelling is a fundamental aspect of human communication,” says our guest Prodip, a volunteer and multi-media storyteller for the Bangladesh Red Crescent. “It inspires us to be a hero of our own community.” We also speak with one such community hero, Dalal al-Taji, a longtime volunteer and advocate for inclusion of people with disabilities in emergencies response. “In disasters. persons with disabilities sometimes get forgotten.”

This post is also available in:

Discover more stories

Get stories worth sharing delivered to your inbox

Want to stay up to date?

This might interest you...

‘What living really means’

In a small peach-coloured house located in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, the Centre for Medico-Social Assistance provides patients with serious illnesses palliative care and the best possible chance to enjoy life.

Check it out